Hermono
Rookie

Is chasms windows 7 compatible with 512 mb of ram?


I have an old fashion computer in my house. It has windows xp and has 512 mb of ram. It has Pentium 4 processor. I want to install chasms windows 7 in it. Most of my friend are telling me that chasms windows 7 is not compatible in Pentium 4 processor and 512 mb ram. I am very confused about it. Do you know whether chasms windows 7 is compatible with 512 mb of ram or not?
6 months ago
Respond to this discussion
Harshal Patel | Oct 19 2011

As you can see, with this resource under the configuration of Windows 7 uses far less RAM than Vista, and also has a small footprint on your hard drive. A few configuration notes can help put these results in perspective:

For XP, the installation includes Service Pack 3, plus all available updates, including Internet Explorer 7, Windows Media Player 11 and Windows Search 4. The only non-Windows application installed on this system is Firefox.
For Vista, the installation was of Ultimate Edition (x86) with Service Pack 1 and all critical and recommended updates available. No third party software installed.
For Windows 7 Beta, I used the Ultimate x64 edition. As with the Vista installation, I have accepted all critical or recommended updates and install any third party software.
The numbers and graphs do not really tell the whole story, however. With identical configurations, Windows 7 was much faster at startup and shutdown Windows Vista, and some routine tasks that would stop the Vista machine to a complete halt without incident at the Windows 7 machine.

Just for comparison, to reconfigure each system to include 1024 MB of RAM. With the additional RAM available, the delta between Windows 7 and Vista VM was drastically reduced, although the 64-bit edition of Windows 7 still used less RAM than Vista. In the Vista system,. This update makes a noticeable difference, while Windows 7 system performed about the same.

Clearly, the development team of Windows 7 has taken a close look at performance and disk space when resources are not abundant. I suspect that when Vista was being designed, it was an afterthought, with the idea that the RAM and hard drives cheap make those obsolete machines. They did not account for netbooks or the impact of solid state drives, which offer capabilities that are much smaller than equivalent rotating media.

Why use Windows 7 much less disk space than Vista? A very small amount of savings (much less than I expected) is in the program code. The biggest saving storage space is preallocated volume shadow, which has restore points and backup files over the role of previous versions. Vista on my virtual machine, this function is used more than 4.6 GB of disk space. In Windows 7, the reserve of less than 400 MB.

This focus on outcomes when resources are less than expected in a modern desktop PC potentially has positive implications for netbooks and other cheap computers. I'll have to carry that old 2002-era Pentium 4 mothballs and see how it handles Windows 7.

© 2012, Instamedia. Some rights reserved. Powered by Instapress and Instacheckin.